Use.AI data shows that many adults distinguish between losing a job and delegating the work inside it. Most want AI to handle routine production while preserving human control over direction, evaluation and final decisions.
58% of adults worry that artificial intelligence could replace people in their jobs, yet 72% want the technology to take over most of their own daily workload, according to a Use.AI survey of 11,230 adults across Europe, the U.S. and Latin America.
The findings reveal less of a contradiction than a boundary. Respondents appear willing to automate substantial parts of their work, but they remain reluctant to surrender the employment, authority and responsibility attached to their role. What they want is not necessarily replacement, but a redistribution of labour between people and machines.
The strongest demand concerns repetitive work. 82% said they wanted to delegate routine administrative tasks to AI. These activities often consume a significant share of the working day while contributing less to how people define their professional value. Removing them would not eliminate the role itself, but it would change what the person occupying that role is expected to do.
The preference extends beyond occasional assistance. 61% said they would rather have AI complete an entire task and leave them responsible only for approving the final result. Under that arrangement, the human contribution moves away from producing every component of the work and towards setting requirements, checking quality and deciding whether the output is fit for use.
That shift is consistent with how respondents described professional value. 60% said that setting direction or evaluating the outcome was the most important source of their contribution at work. For this group, value does not depend primarily on drafting every document, completing every calculation or assembling every presentation. It depends on defining the objective and judging whether the finished result meets it.
Attitudes towards authorship follow a similar pattern. 69% considered AI-generated material their own work when they had provided the instructions. The result suggests that many people now associate ownership with intention and selection rather than direct production. Establishing the goal and choosing the final version can be enough to preserve a sense of authorship, even when AI performs much of the execution.
Delegation, however, still has a clear limit. 68% wanted to retain the final decision, while 54% were unwilling to allow AI to send, publish or submit completed material without a final human action. Respondents were prepared to automate much of the process, but many continued to draw a line at the point where an output became an official decision carrying their name and responsibility.
The survey also identified tension around professional skills. 66% said workers should maintain abilities that AI can perform for them, while 49% preferred the technology to handle those tasks whenever possible. The results do not establish that the same respondents held both views, but they point to a wider challenge: workers may support the preservation of expertise while creating fewer opportunities to practise it.
The time released by automation would not primarily be used to withdraw from work. 85% said they would direct it towards other professional activity, learning or increased productivity. This weakens the idea that demand for AI reflects a simple desire to work less. For most respondents, the expected benefit is a shift towards other forms of work and development.
The broader finding is that people are not asking AI to make them irrelevant. They are asking it to reduce the number of tasks for which their direct involvement remains necessary. The emerging division is increasingly clear: execution can be delegated, but direction, judgment and responsibility are still widely regarded as human work.
About Use.AI
Use.AI is a universal AI assistant that aggregates the world's leading large language models into one unified and seamless experience. It provides users with a single point of access to the most advanced AI capabilities available today, from complex problem-solving to creative content generation. By bridging the gap between multiple AI technologies, Use.AI empowers users to enhance their productivity and leverage cutting-edge intelligence in their daily workflows.
Media Contact
Alex Samuels
PR Manager
Use.AI
pr@use.ai
The findings reveal less of a contradiction than a boundary. Respondents appear willing to automate substantial parts of their work, but they remain reluctant to surrender the employment, authority and responsibility attached to their role. What they want is not necessarily replacement, but a redistribution of labour between people and machines.
The strongest demand concerns repetitive work. 82% said they wanted to delegate routine administrative tasks to AI. These activities often consume a significant share of the working day while contributing less to how people define their professional value. Removing them would not eliminate the role itself, but it would change what the person occupying that role is expected to do.
The preference extends beyond occasional assistance. 61% said they would rather have AI complete an entire task and leave them responsible only for approving the final result. Under that arrangement, the human contribution moves away from producing every component of the work and towards setting requirements, checking quality and deciding whether the output is fit for use.
That shift is consistent with how respondents described professional value. 60% said that setting direction or evaluating the outcome was the most important source of their contribution at work. For this group, value does not depend primarily on drafting every document, completing every calculation or assembling every presentation. It depends on defining the objective and judging whether the finished result meets it.
Attitudes towards authorship follow a similar pattern. 69% considered AI-generated material their own work when they had provided the instructions. The result suggests that many people now associate ownership with intention and selection rather than direct production. Establishing the goal and choosing the final version can be enough to preserve a sense of authorship, even when AI performs much of the execution.
Delegation, however, still has a clear limit. 68% wanted to retain the final decision, while 54% were unwilling to allow AI to send, publish or submit completed material without a final human action. Respondents were prepared to automate much of the process, but many continued to draw a line at the point where an output became an official decision carrying their name and responsibility.
The survey also identified tension around professional skills. 66% said workers should maintain abilities that AI can perform for them, while 49% preferred the technology to handle those tasks whenever possible. The results do not establish that the same respondents held both views, but they point to a wider challenge: workers may support the preservation of expertise while creating fewer opportunities to practise it.
The time released by automation would not primarily be used to withdraw from work. 85% said they would direct it towards other professional activity, learning or increased productivity. This weakens the idea that demand for AI reflects a simple desire to work less. For most respondents, the expected benefit is a shift towards other forms of work and development.
The broader finding is that people are not asking AI to make them irrelevant. They are asking it to reduce the number of tasks for which their direct involvement remains necessary. The emerging division is increasingly clear: execution can be delegated, but direction, judgment and responsibility are still widely regarded as human work.
About Use.AI
Use.AI is a universal AI assistant that aggregates the world's leading large language models into one unified and seamless experience. It provides users with a single point of access to the most advanced AI capabilities available today, from complex problem-solving to creative content generation. By bridging the gap between multiple AI technologies, Use.AI empowers users to enhance their productivity and leverage cutting-edge intelligence in their daily workflows.
Media Contact
Alex Samuels
PR Manager
Use.AI
pr@use.ai